Skip to main content

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Headed home to Seattle from New York City after my first trip “out.” Nice, but different.

Business is taken in context these days. What seemed important in the past, such as scheduling multiple meetings a day, or accepting what others thought important is no longer as important in the context of the important things in life.

I did have three or four good meetings discussing LexBlog publishing, innovation and our new syndication work.

Syndication to third party publishers by licensing our syndication platform as a SaaS solution continues to be well received. Six meetings now with publishing partners have led to four sales and two very interested publishers.

LexBlog is a big believer in startups/innovators sharing their product idea openly, writing about it, stewing on it via online and face to face engagement and if there is an interest, jumping to selling and then, production.

Early customers are vested in your success and will help you refine your product via questions, feedback and suggestions.

In addition, you are bringing in revenue while doing product development. As opposed to investing human and financial resources in something that may not sell – or if it does, needs to be heavily.

Our syndication portal product is proof positive that there are alternative publishing models to the model of paying reporters and editors and then selling subscriptions and advertising.

Writers, reporters and columnists shouldn’t have to pay for the distribution of their stories in any business model – which they do not here. In addition, those writers, reporters and editors don’t need to be paid when they have an alternative source of revenue – think lawyers.

Nice dinner last evening with a delightful professional who is interesting in selling for LexBlog in New York City and Europe. We talked business, but more so about life and family. Felt good.

She’d light up a room, represent us so well and nurture relationships – the heart of business development. I’m hopeful.

Big kudos to the folks who gave me their ear and shoulder. It helps so much to talk about the last month, the last year and what the kids and I are feeling. I have also found the “club” of those who are grieving or have grieved to be much larger than I’d thought.

People are so different in how they respond and treat you – and I am talking of people who are well aware of what we’ve been living.

Many act like nothing’s changed, with their focus being on business and cheerily ask “how you you doing, things must be going well for you,” never mentioning the subject, presumably thinking to do so would bring you down.

Others thought of it as a short term loss – “Kevin is going to have a tough couple months.” Was glad to hear that I’d be up and at it by March.

Didn’t really begrudge these folks, just laughed it off that they didn’t know what to say or simply didn’t have a clue.

Was enjoyable to discuss with other legal professionals who have lost a spouse at a “younger age” just how some folks react to you.

For everyone who wasn’t sure how to react though, there were fifty who did. Sensitive thoughts, pulling me aside to share how bad they felt, an offer to go out for dinner just to talk. So kind. So thoughtful.

Thank you all. Onward – I guess. ;)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Job security is a myth for lawyers without a personal brand

I talked with a highly respected legal professional last Friday who was recently let go by his law firm. He had been employed by the firm for four or five years and employed by similar large law firms for a couple decades before. A couple weeks ago I heard of veteran lawyer who joined a large firm with a major client, but whose employment status was now at risk with the general counsel’s leaving his client. These stories pale in comparison to all of the lawyers who have been the victim of downsizing caused by the collapse or merger of their law firms. With the changes in the legal services market, very few lawyers have job (or stable income) security  writes Dan Lear, Director of Industry Relations at Avvo. Lawyers need to build a strong brand or a business, and to do so now, Per Lear, the job security once held by law firm partners and in-house counsel who had reached the the ranks of Assistant General Counsel or Deputy General Counsel is gone. There’s the former general counse

The economics of a legal blogging network as a virtual community

Over twenty years ago I read of the power of virtual communities in Net Gain, Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities by John Hagel and Arthur Armstrong (now executive director of Debevoise &Plimpton). I read  Net Gain  then while creating Prairielaw.com, a virtual law community of lawyers and lay people alike, later sold to LexisNexis. I am reading Net Gain again as LexBlog’s worldwide legal blogging network begins to pick up steam. This legal blogging network is every bit a virtual community of: Blogging legal professionals Those supporting these legal bloggers – LexBlog and its partners Those whom benefit from the legal information and commentary of legal bloggers, including legal professionals, consumers of legal services empowered by legal blogs to select a lawyer in a more informed fashion, and other publishers who receive blog commentary by syndication. No question there is a business model in organizing a legal blogging community, so long as the focus rema

Blogging Makes You a Better Lawyer

LexBlog’s associate editor, Melissa Lin , shared on Twitter this week a blog post of mine on some of the reasons that lawyers blog – to learn, to join a conversation and to build a community. To which Josh King , the former general counsel of Avvo and the current general counsel of realself  added, “Also makes you a better lawyer. Also makes you a better lawyer. — Josh King (@joshuamking) September 27, 2019 I have been following King’s blog for years. He has a keen interest in the professional speech regulation of lawyers, and how that regulation may not serve the public interest. I’ve watched him pick up relevant news stories, whether from traditional media or legal bloggers, dissect the issue, analyze the law and share his commentary. Good stuff. I engaged him and others on many of his posts. King was doing exactly one of the things we were told in law school, and which the consumer of legal services would like to see in their lawyer, he was staying up to speed in relevant