Skip to main content

Seventeen Christmases of Blogs And RSS

Blogs and RSS

This Christmas marks seventeen Christmases of blogs and RSS for me.

Blogs represented the democratization of publishing for me in 2003.

RSS was the radio signal that enabled bloggers to “broadcast” and have their signal received on a RSS reader on other’s computers.

A personal publishing press on your computer for which your copy was distributed for free.

Another way to look at it, a personal radio station broadcast to radios, worldwide, again all at no cost.

Powerful stuff, when you pause to think about it.

What a perfect way for lawyers to publish, or broadcast, relevant resources to select audiences . The little guy competes with the big guy.

Need not worry about people you may want to connect with finding your publication or station. It was “if you build it, they will come.”

Google surfacing the good stuff and others with similar interests sharing and citing what you published.

What a way for lawyers to connect with people in a real, authentic and intimate way.

With lawyers as the enablers of law in our society, blogs and RSS drove the law.

Blogs and RSS provided access to the law – and for the average consumer and small business person how to use legal services and which lawyer was the right one for you.

Seventeen Christmases in, blogs and RSS remain every bit as powerful and effective.

Dave Winer, the founder of RSS and blogging, wrote this week that we have made a terrible mistake in “…walking away from the powerful open and independent amateur publishing features of the web.”

As to the popular refrain that RSS died by Google’s unfairly killing off Google Reader, Winer’s right in saying:

“It’s fun to hate Google Reader, but it’s over my friend, and we are free to do whatever we like. Enjoy the holidays knowing that Google Reader is dead, RSS is fine.”

If you build it, they will come, remains true for bloggers putting in the time and care to offer value.

To the extent that blogs and RSS have become less effective for some individuals, that’s more a result of self-destructive blogging behavior than blogs.

SEO over all else, ghost writers, distribution mediums, web traffic as the sole goal, blogs inside websites to draw readers to things for which they have no interest and social media versus publishing.

They all represent a move away from the “powerful open and independent amateur publishing” aspect of blogs and RSS.

Merry Christmas. The gift of blogs and RSS remains very much alive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Defense Attorney Megan Zavieh on Ethics and Representing Other Lawyers

Kevin speaking with Megan Zavieh, Legal Ethics & Defense Attorney at Zeviah Law , at the 2019 Clio Cloud Conference in San Diego. Megan represents others lawyers before the California State Bar who are facing ethic inquiries, and also runs a legal podcast called Lawyers Gone Ethical . 

Are service and solution providers reducing prices to law firms?

As reported by the ABA Journal’s Debra Cassens Weiss, another large law firm is laying off a number of administrative staffers as it changes its staffing model. Apparently this is nothing new as a survey (PDF) by law firm consultant, Altman Weil found that forty-eight percent of law firm leaders are cutting staff to increase profits. Taking the firms at their word, layoffs are often coming from increased efficiencies and modernization. I’m sure in other cases staff layoffs are coming for exactly the opposite reason – a lack of efficiency, tech advancements and innovation. In any case, I wonder what companies selling services and products are doing to help law firms on the cost front. After all, these companies should have declining costs with innovation and efficiencies, in large part driven by their own technology. As a result, their costs of production and their own staff needs may be declining. By turning the design and development into a “software” driven system (SAAS), we

Blogging for learning and networking for legal tech entrepreneurs

Spending four days this week at AALL (American Association of Law Libraries) I was blown away by the amount of legal tech driving the law. I was also struck again by legal tech companies failure to use Internet engagement to learn, to collaborate with other legal tech companies and to get known. Legal tech entrepreneurs don’t seem to use the net to share their thoughts on what they are following in tech, to engage other legal tech folks, to share what they are working on so as to learn and get feedback or to get known. It’s a little odd since much of the technology driving legal technology is open source. A lot of legal tech is driven and supported by the collaboration of open source tech communities regularly sharing, networking and learning online. It’s also odd in that a lot of legal tech companies are starved for attention. They’ve got cool stuff of value to companies and law firms. They just don’t get heard among all the noise and wrongly think it’s going to take money for ad